Baotić-Rustanbegović, Andrea.
(2018).
Sculpture in Bosnia and Herzegovina during the Austrohungarian rule 1878-1918.
PhD Thesis. Filozofski fakultet u Zagrebu, Department of Art History.
(Poslijediplomski doktorski studij povijesti umjetnosti)
[mentor Kraševac, Irena].
Abstract
This thesis deals with the topic of sculpture in Bosnia and Herzegovina between 1878 and
1918. In the abovementioned period, the country was under the rule of the Austro-Hungarian
Monarchy and experienced significant political and social changes. An abrupt penetration of
aquis and thus also of visual arts from the Western European civilisation circle was enabled in
Bosnia and Herzegovina, the former Ottoman province. Namely, sculpture as an artistic form
almost became extinct during the centuries-long rule of the Ottomans in Bosnia and
Herzegovina and gained new significance and usage with the arrival of the new
administration.
The topic of sculpture in Bosnia and Herzegovina under the Austro-Hungarian rule has
not been scientifically elaborated so far. Sculpture was only casually mentioned in art
historiography and that in the context of architecture (i.e. architectural decorative sculpture)
and the apprearance of modern art. Sacral sculpture as well as monumental sculpture
remained almost entirely unexplored. One of the reasons due to which art historians did not
engage in exploring sculpture of the Austro-Hungarian period in Bosnia and Herzegovina lies
in the fact that it is until today preserved only scarcely as a result of political circumstances,
natural disasters and war. Apart from that, the profession mainly focused on affirming
autochthonous and modern art and neglected historicism, which was preserved for the longest
period of time in art and architecture of the aforementioned period. In the context of the
situation in B&H, the opinion that fine arts from the period of the Austro-Hungarian rule
represents a foreign import that did not suit the spirit of the area was present and thus does not
deserve scientific valorization. This kind of attitude contributed to additional destruction of
sculptural artistic legacy, which was significantly rarefied until today.
The fact that the topic of sculpture in Bosnia an Herzegovina under the Austro-Hungarian
rule was not treated adequately is what caused the need for its thorough scientific examination
to arise. Revalorization of the artistic and architectural aquis of historicism which emerged in
the regional and European context during the last few decades, created an additional need for
questioning the former stances and the aquisition of overall and comprehensive
aknowledgements regarding sculpture from the end of the 19th and the beginning of the 20th
century. The aim of this work is, thus, to provide a systematic overview of sculpture in Bosnia
and Herzegovina under the Austro-Hungarian rule. By means of this work, an insight into the
conditions, the flow and the size of the distribution of sculpture should be given. Also, it is attempted to unveil and present the separate names of workshops, masters and artists who
created sculptural pieces. Apart from that, it is intended to define typological, stylistic and
iconographic features of sculpture. The goal, in the end, is to valorize the quality of sculpture
in the context of local, regional and European artistic movements.
Due to the fact that sculpture in Bosnia and Herzegovina from the end of the 19th century
appeared in an area where there was no tradition i.e. no continuity in the creation of this
artistic form and that in a time when significant changes appeared in a wider WesternEuropean
context in terms of the perception of form and function of the tool itself, this work
discusses several important questions. First, which elements contributed to the appearance of
sculpture, and which hindered it? Secondly, was sculpture a form in which religious, national
and civic identities were to be distinguished exclusively of the migrated population or was it a
tool that the local population accepted equally regardless of their confession? Third, to which
degree was the sculpture that was imported to Bosnia and Herzegovina close to the sculpture
of the artistic centres which it emerged from? And finally, fourth, whether real foundations
for the development of sculpture as an artistic discipline were laid in Bosnia and Herzegovina
during the Austro-Hungarian rule form 1878 to 1918. In the context of the questions listed
above, the hypothesis of this paper would be that sculpture in Bosnia and Herzegovina under
the Austro-Hungarian rule gradually gained importance and that its appearance was mainly
connected to political and material situations of the country. Different identities are
recognised when it comes to sculpture that is placed in public space. Although it was mainly
imported, sculpture was not always a work of “serial production“ and in several cases
presented individual works of art, some of which were created on “domestic soil“. The need
for sculpture in Bosnia and Herzegovina appeared in the period between 1878 and 1918, but
because of the lack of organised institutional and wider socio-economic structure, no
foundations were laid for its development.
Sculpture in Bosnia and Herzegovina can be divided into sacral, architectural,
monumental and sculpture shown in exhibitions. This kind of division is based on typological
features of sculpture, and the order of the listed unities is conditioned by its scope and
preservation of sculptural works. Within the unities that were categorized this way, the
research of sculpture was conducted and its examination carried out. Also, the chapters in the
dissertation were named in accordance with the listed units. Each of the chapters presents a
chronological structure, and for the purpose of achieving a better overview, it was further
classified into subgroups, depending on the characteristics that were crucial for each of the
sculptural units. Chapters are structured in a manner to initially show an insight into the outcome and the norms of the formation of every type of sculpture that was mentioned and
then the circumstances that contributed to the appearance of sculpture in Bosnia and
Herzegovina or that hindered it. In that way, a clearer comparison of sculpture in Bosnia and
Herzegovina with the one that was created in the artistic centers of the Monarchy was enabled
and consequently the possibility of an adequate valorization provided.
The first chapter deals with the question of sacral sculpture of the Catholic
provenance. It relates mainly to the statues and reliefs that are found on altars and other sacral
equipment that decorated the interiors of churches in Bosnia and Herzegvina. These were
mainly works of woodcarving workshops in Tyrol, which was the center of sacral art at the
end of the 19th and the beginning of the 20th century. To a lesser degree, the sculptures in
Catholic churches were imported from Croatia and form today's Germany and Slovenia
(Bavaria, Styria and Carniola). Field work for the research of this type of sculpture included
the parishes Archdiocese Vrhbosna, i.e., the Arcdiakonatus of Fojnica, Guča Gora, Sutjeska,
Kreševo and Tolisa, since these are the places where most of the sculptures from the marked
period were preserved. Protocol books and registries from the Archive of the Archdiocese
Vrhbosna were used as archive sources (period 1881 – 1918), as well as chronicles,
testimorials and account books from the archive of particular monasteries and parishes. An
important source were archival data taken from protocol books and diaries (Journal and
Hauptbuch, 1881 – 1918) of the workshop of sculptor and altar maker Ferdinand Stuflesser in
St. Ulrich, Tyrol. As a secondary source, periodicals were used, primarily newspapers
Vrhbosna and Glasnik bosansko-hercegovačkih franjevaca, in which data about the
construction of churches and their equipment was published. Based on the existing and
researched matter the authorship of sacral sculptures was confirmed and these were presented
within the frames of workshops and the sculptors who created them. So, this chapter presents
statues and reliefs of wood-cravers from Tyrol (Ferdinand Stuflesser, Franz and Josef
Schmalzl, Josef Obletter as well as Klarenz Hemmelmayr), the Bavarian workshop for sacral
art (“Mayer'sche Kunstanstalt“ from Munich) and Croatian sculptors (Dragutin Morak and
Josip Barišković). The chapter establishes a connection between the source of sacral art in the
Monarchy and its reach into Bosnia and Herzegovina. The role of ordinariates of the
Archdiocese Vrhbosna as an institution which was responsible for passing regulations during
the construction and equipment of churches throughout the country and which also
intermediated in the delivery of sacral sculptures, is explained. The contribution of Josip pl.
Vancaš as an architect who developed entire projects of churches and who gave plans for
sacral quipment that also implied the creation of sculptural art work was also confirmed. It is shown in the chapter that sacral sculpture of the Catholic provenance in Bosnia and
Herzegovina was formed in accordance with the principles of church art and academic
thought of the time of historicism and which presented a segment in the creation of the total
work of art (the so called Gesamtkunstwerk). Considering that it was imported from the center
of church art and that prominent sculptors and woodcarvers worked on it, formally and
stylisticly it does not fall behind other, more representative examples of sacral sculpture in
Catholic churches in the Monarchy.
The second chapter refers to architectural sculpture, i.e. figural sculpture that decorates
facades of buildings with administrative, cultural, business and residential use. It refers
mainly to works that were constructed in “artificial stone“, created by foreign authors and
construction firms. For this part, field work included research in Sarajevo due to the fact that
Sarajevo, as the administrative and cultural center of Bosnia and Herzegovina, was the only
place where more representative buildings decorated with figural sculpture were raised. The
primary source for research were archival documents secured in the Archive of Bosnia and
Herzegovina, the Museum of History, the Institute for development planning of the Sarajevo
Canton, as well as in the Federal Institute for the preservation of monuments (Sarajevo). It is
primarily related to architectural plans and architectural project costs and, to a lesser degree, it
gives information about authors and contractors of sculptural decoration for some buildings.
Such data was mainly found in secondary sources, i.e. in periodicals and mainly so in
Sarajevo newspapers such as Bosnische Post and Sarajevski list, and then also in Viennesse
architectural magazines Der Bautechniker and Wienerbauindustrie Zeitung. The attribution
of sculptural works for which no data was available was conducted through comparative
analysis, i.e. the comparison of Sarajevoan examples of architectural statuary with similar
constructions in other places of the Monarchy. Considering the issues that appear as a crucial
factor when it comes to architectural sculpture, the matter in this chapter is initially divided
into sacral and profane sculpture and then further categorized according to formal-stylistic
and typological categories of buildings that are decorated by the sculpture. The chapter first
discusses the relation of decorative sculpture and its architectural background and then the
question of the appearance of figural sculpture and its siginificance in public space is raised. It
is shown how sculpture is subordinated to the architectural frame accordingly to principles of
strict historicism and how it exclusively presents topics of Christian iconography in terms of
content. As opposed to this, sculpture that decorates buildings with the characteristics of late
historicism and secession is formed more freely in opposition to its architectural background
and in a iconographic sense encompasses a wider spectrum of content. It is also shown how these contents were conditioned not only by the purpose of the buildings, but by the political
frames, because architectural sculpture starts serving the purpose of expressing national ideas
after the Annexation in 1908. In the chapter, it is aimed also at questioning the relation
between architects, sculptors and sculpture studios in the process of making sculptures, i.e. at
confirming their individual contribution in shaping building facades. Among the architects
who gave an important place to sculpture in their construction projects, Josip Vancaš, Karlo
Paržik, Rudolf Tönnies and Josip Rekvenyi are singled out. Among those who have one
significant architectural achievement with figural decoration, Miloš Miladinović and Dioniz
Sunko are mentioned. Through an insight into the archive and with the help of comparative
analysis, the authors of several sculptures were discovered. Those were Johann Novotny,
Friedrich Christoph Hausmann, Dragutin Morak, Robert Jean Ivanović and István Tóth,
alongside with the previously known Frangeš Mihanović, Franjo Rebhan and Mišo Stević.
The names of a couple of construction firms and sculpture studios which created sculptures
for the buildings of Sarajevo were confirmed, the most productive of which were “Horvath &
Scheidig“, “Jung & Russ“, as well as the firm “Wienerberger Ziegelfabriks“, which was not
known until now. It is shown in the chapter that instances of this type of sculpture vary in
terms of quality and are thus hard to be characterized unambiguously, exactly because they
were produced by individuals of different skills, affiliations and education. The major part of
sculptural achievements, however, indicates that their origin lied in artistic thought that
marked the cultural milieu of the Monarchy from the end of the 19th and the beginning of the
20th century.
The third chapter of the dissertation deals with the topic of monumental sculpture. It
includes sculpture that was placed in public space and mainly served the purpose of
commemorating the Habsburgs, and then the significant individuals and fallen soldiers.
Considering the fact that this type of sculpture remained in situ only in several cases, filed
work was brought down to Sarajevo. Monuments with figural sculpture which remind of
deserving persons are preserved in the capital of Bosnia and Herzegovina only in sepulcral
space while sculptures which adorned monuments that were of dynastic character were partly
preserved and stored in the depots of the Art Gallery of B&H and the Museum of Sarajevo.
The image of monumental sculpture and its scope is therefore reconstructed in this chapter.
Published and unpublished archival content from the Archive of Bosnia and Herzegovina and
the documentation from the Art Gallery of B&H was used for this purpose. Periodicals from
the period between 1878 and 1918 were also largely used and mostly so the newspapers
Bosnische Post, Sarajevski list and Hrvatski dnevnik published in Sarajevo, as well as Österreichisch Illustrierte Zeitung and Der Bautechniker published in Vienna. Sculpture is
presented in the cahpter in the frame of typological division to dynastic monuments, war
monuments and monuments of significant persons. The relation between figural sculpture and
public space is discussed, i.e. the meanings of monumental sculpture in the context of the
question of national identity and complex social circumstances in Bosnia and Herzegovina. It
is shown that figural plastic art was directly conditioned by the political situation in the
country. It is explained how sculpture almost entirely referred to the glorification of emperor
Franz Joseph I and the dynasty, and it appeared more in public space only after the
Annexation in 1908. It is also shown how monumental sculpture started gaining new contents
and new meanings with the outbreak of World War I. Moreover, it is made evident that
sculpture in the civic type monuments was rare and that it was kept within sepulchral space.
Considering that the data that was processed during this research was unknown until today,
names of artists who created sculpture for Bosnia and Herzegovina were discovered and the
preserved works of art from the Art Gallery of B&H were attributed. Sculptors such as Anton
Brenek, Robert Frangeš Mihanović, Josef Wilk, Theodor Franz Marie Khuen, Franz Zelezny
and István Tóth are mentioned in the chapter, apart from Rudolf Valdec, Eugen Bory and
Rudolf and Ludviga Valić, who were previously known. Their sculptures are brought into
connection with those situated on monuments in other cities of the Monarchy and it is shown
that the sculptures from dynastic monuments were reproductions of already existing works of
art, while sculptures from civic monuments were unique sculptures.
The fourth and also the last chapter of the dissertation deals with the topic of statuary in
exhibitions. These mainly assume expositions of regional i.e. “country“, international and
world format in which Bosnia and Herzegovina took part. These are followed also by
exhibitions that were held in Sarajevo as the capital of the country and those were local in
character. The latter included the most significant art exhibitions and the sculpture at these
exhibitions were only exhibited by Croatian artists Branislav Dešković, Rudolf and Ludviga
Valić, as well as the sculptor Robert Jean Ivanović. Due to the fact that sculpture was a rare
phenomenon at exhibitions and that it was only scarcely preserved, the focus of research was
directed at the aspects of content and meaning of sculpture, as well as its general appearance
as an artistic form in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Apart from artifacts stored in the glyptotheque
HAZU in Zagreb and the Gallery Bol in Brač, exhibition catalogues and periodicals from the
period 1896-1917 were explored and consulted for this chapter. Articles from the
hemeroteque, i.e. from B&H newspapers such as Bosnische Post, Sarajevski list, Hrvatski
dnevnik Srpska riječ and Nada, of the Art Gallery of B&H in Sarajevo were elaborated. The aim was to gain an insight into the social meaning of exhibitions, what role sculpture had in
them and how was it perceived in art ctiticism. The analysed works refer to those exhibited in
B&H pavillions at the International exposition in Brussels in 1897 and the World exhibition
in Paris 1900, in the production of which the artists Alfons Mucha, Auguste Seysses and
Herman Kautsch took part. Sculptures displayed at the solo exhibition of Branislav Dešković
in 1910 were also thoroughly analysed, followed by the exhibitions of the art couple Valić
from 1912, as well as works of Robert Jean Ivanović, who was the only sculptor who
participated at the First exhibition of B&H artists in Sarajevo in 1917. Exhibitions were
observed also in the context of cultural politics of the Austro-Hungarian rule and the
organisation of artistic life in Bosnia and Herzegovina. They were likewise observed in the
context of dominant artistic movements in the Monarchy, i.e. the region. In the chapter, it is
shown how sculptural works in the sense of form, style and content were conditioned by the
character of exhibitions and the time frame within which they ensued. In this manner,
sculptures displayed on international exhibitions abroad, were shaped in the spirit of
historicism and partly of secession, while they carried elements of symbolism, secession,
Rodin's sculpture and impressionism at the art exhibitions in Sarajevo.
Based on the explored, analysed and displayed matter, the conclusion is reached in the
dissertation that the appearance and the diffusion of sculpture in Bosnia and Herzegovina
under the Austro-Hungarian rule was directly conditioned by political, cultural and material
factors. Sculpture gradually gained importance, initially appearing in sacral buildings of the
Catholic provenance and on the facades of architectural facilities for different purposes, then
on monuments in public space and eventually also in art exhibitions. Its function was
therefore first directed at serving the religious cult, the ornamentation of buildings and the
expression of their purpose. Later, after the annexation in 1908, sculpture served the purpose
of expressing national ideas, glorifying emperor Franz Joseph and the Habsburg dynasty, as
well as the commemoration of prominent persons and the deceased soldiers in the war. Once
it was placed on monuments in public space, sculpture served also as the means of displaying
certain identities that were loyal to the regime. With art exhibitions, sculpture became also a
medium through which sculptors expressed their own ideas and personal aritstic possibilities.
When it comes to formal-stylistic features of sculpture, it is concluded that it is marked to a
larger degree with the characteristics of historicism and academism and to a lesser degree
with symbolism, secession and impressionist sculpture. The reason for this sort of
manifestation lay in the requests of the customer and the capabilities and affiliations of those
involved in its production. For sacral sculpture, which was most represented in scope in Bosnia and Herzegovina, respecting the rules of church art and the favorisation of works trom
Tyrol workshops partly contributed to it being marked by historicism for the longest period of
time. For architectural sculpture, the lapse from historicism was present only then when its
production was entrusted to strong authors. Historicism with academicism was dominant in
commemorative sculpture since it was made by the authors affirmed in court and political
circles, and those were responsible for the delivery of the listed sculptures to Bosnia and
Herzegovina. Only at art exhibitions in Sarajevo, sculptural works departed largely from
historicism because they were shaped by young and talented sculptors who were familiar with
modern artistic ideas.
When it comes to the valorization of sculpture, it is concluded that it had sources in
cultural centers of the Monarchy and that it clearly testified about the artistic movements that
seized Bosnia and Herzegovina during the Austro-Hungarian rule. Its value lies also in the
fact that it strongly reflected complexity and the problems of presentation within the
mentioned spatial and temporal context.
Item Type: |
PhD Thesis
|
Uncontrolled Keywords: |
sculpture, sacral sculpture, architectural sculpture, commemorative sculpture, figural
sculpture, sculpture in public space, sculpture on exhibitions, historicism, sacral art,
altarmaking, woodcarving, secession, cultural policy, Bosnia and Herzegovina, AustroHungarian
Monarchy |
Subjects: |
History of art |
Departments: |
Department of Art History |
Supervisor: |
Kraševac, Irena |
Additional Information: |
Poslijediplomski doktorski studij povijesti umjetnosti |
Date Deposited: |
07 Jun 2018 08:59 |
Last Modified: |
13 Apr 2021 23:15 |
URI: |
http://darhiv.ffzg.unizg.hr/id/eprint/10086 |
Actions (login required)
|
View Item |